This version of SWEHB is associated with NPR 7150.2B. Click for the latest version of the SWEHB based on NPR7150.2C

SWE-030 - Verification Results

1. Requirements

3.10.4 The project manager shall record, address, and track to closure the results of software verification activities.

1.1 Notes

NPR 7150.2, NASA Software Engineering Requirements, does not include any notes for this requirement.

1.2 Applicability Across Classes























Key:    - Applicable | - Not Applicable
A & B = Always Safety Critical; C & D = Not Safety Critical; CSC & DSC = Safety Critical; E - H = Never Safety Critical.

2. Rationale

Simply performing verification is only one of the elements necessary to ensure the software work product meets the specified requirements. The software development team must capture the results of verification activities and document the findings to prove the verification was conducted correctly. All identified issues are analyzed to determine their causes. The team can then identify associated resolutions, and track to closure the work required to implement those resolutions. Successful closure assures that all requirements are satisfied (including the development and resolution of waiver requests, if needed).

Where resolution involves revision to the verification process, environment, etc., tracking such changes helps to identify and document process improvements. The subsequent implementation of these process improvements will capture quality increases that result in more accurate verification results in the future.

3. Guidance

The basic verification process is shown below with the steps addressed by this requirement highlighted:

The following list provides examples of information typically captured in the verification results, analysis results, or in the post-analysis documentation of those results. Center procedures may call for additional items, or additional information may be needed to document fully the result or identified issue. Note that problem tracking or corrective action tools may capture some of this information automatically.

  • A full identification of the system and the software, including, as applicable, identification number(s), title(s), abbreviation(s), version number(s), and release number(s)
  • An assessment of the manner in which the verification environment may be different from the operational environment and the effect of this difference on the results.
  • The results of the verification activity, including all verified requirements. The summary includes information on the requirements evaluated, (if tested, the success of the test), and references to any problems or deviations.
  • An overall assessment of the software performance and quality as demonstrated by the results in this report.
  • A list of any deficiencies, limitations, or constraints that were detected; problem or change reports may be used to provide deficiency information. (e.g., a description of the impact on software and system performance, the impact a correction would have on software, system design, and associated documentation, and recommendations for correcting the deficiency, limitation, or constraint).

The results, and the verification activities and verified products that generated them, can be recorded in the following ways, as appropriate for the method used:

  • Verification reports.
  • Review meeting minutes/reports.
  • Review Item Dispositions (RIDs).
  • As-run test logs.
  • Demonstration results.
  • Analysis reports.
  • User group reports.
  • Conduct peer reviews.
  • Analyze peer review results.
  • Issue tracking system.
  • Change requests/change request system.

The Tools section lists several examples of templates for this type of document. See SWE-028 and the Note in SDP-SMP for information on what verification includes. See Software Test Report for information on software test reporting. See SWE-031 for related information on reporting validation results that may be helpful here.

When analyzing verification results to determine whether those results support a conclusion that the software satisfies the specified requirements, consider the following steps:

  • Compare actual to expected results.
  • Identify discrepancies or mismatches in specification or behavior.
    • Document discrepancies individually for ease of tracking through the resolution process.
    • Determine cause of the issue, including problems with the verification methods, criteria, or environment.
  • Identify the changes required to address discrepancies.
  • Evaluate and record the impact of changes needed to correct issues/discrepancies.
    • Plan for any repeat of verification effort (See SWE-028)
  • Obtain and record approval for changes to be made to the current project versus those to be addressed at a different time as part of a general process improvement activity.
  • Measure and predict quality of the software based on the verification results (typically, a software assurance activity).

When tracking discrepancies to closure, consider the following activities:

  • Capture the changes to be made (change requests, corrective actions, review item dispositions (RID), etc.).
  • Carry out the approved changes to be made.
  • Follow chosen solution to completion, including any verification activities necessary to confirm the issue has been resolved.
  • Obtain and record approval for issue close-out.

Center or project procedures may require additional documentation not described above.

4. Small Projects

No additional guidance is available for small projects. The community of practice is encouraged to submit guidance candidates for this paragraph.

5. Resources

5.1 Tools

Tools relative to this SWE may be found in the table below. You may wish to reference the Tools Table in this handbook for an evolving list of these and other tools in use at NASA. Note that this table should not be considered all-inclusive, nor is it an endorsement of any particular tool. Check with your Center to see what tools are available to facilitate compliance with this requirement.

Tool nameTypeOwner/SourceLinkDescriptionUser

Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP) Template


Texas State University Computer Science Department


(based on IEEE standards) Link not valid.

Software Test Report Template

SPAN - Accessible to NASA users via SPAN tab in this Handbook. By Request - Non-NASA users, contact User for a copy of this tool.

Glenn Research Center


Template. Search in SPAN for "GRC__TM_20110415_SW_Test_Report "


6. Lessons Learned

No Lessons Learned have currently been identified for this requirement.

  • No labels